Facts matter. Or so you thought. Lately, though, you've been watching workplace conflicts handled on assumptions and half-truths. Decisions are being made without anyone taking the time to check the facts or truly understand the situation on the ground. Even worse, critical details about your team’s work

“So, here’s what I think.” That’s what you wish you could say. But as you sit in a meeting about a workplace conflict, it feels like you’re watching decisions unfold from behind a glass wall. Important choices are being made, yet no one seems interested in your

You’re no Sherlock Holmes. But you’ve noticed a pattern in how workplace disputes are handled. Some concerns are taken seriously, while others barely get a second glance. Certain individuals always seem to come out on top, as if the outcomes were decided before the process even began. These

“What is good for the goose is good for the gander.” You might have heard the saying before. But in workplace conflicts, it often seems like the metaphorical goose and gander aren’t standing on equal ground. When some people raise issues, they're addressed promptly and fairly. But